正义的伙伴

恭喜！达成签约！1年260万！小欧文降临金州！_我的网站

一 |     Harvey Weinstein has broken his silence to vehemently deny allegations made by former model Kaja Sokola that he sexually assaulted her in 2002 when she was just 16.,“I know where I stand and how I am seen, nonetheless, it doesn't make every allegation against me true or factual,” Weinstein said in a statement to the Daily Mail through his representative.,“There is no truth to me having met this woman in 2002,” Weinstein stated.,“In response to the claims made by Ms. Sokola in her complaint, Mr. Weinstein categorically, and emphatically, has denied, and continues to deny, the allegations made against him,” Weinstein's attorney Imran H. Ansari told the outlet.,The disgraced movie mogul, currently behind bars at the Twin Towers Correctional Facility in Los Angeles, is serving a 23-year sentence after he was convicted in 2020 in New York for raping an actress in 2013 and sexually assaulting a production assistant at his apartment in 2006.,The ex-Hollywood producer is scheduled to go on trial on October 10 in Los Angeles where he faces 11 charges of rape and sexual assault from five women, which he denies.,Kaja Sokola has one of the last pending misconduct lawsuits against Harvey Weinstein, which she filed in 2019.,ViralBook: Harvey Weinstein Thought He Was Attractive Despite 'Deformed' Genitalia and 'Bad Hygiene'25 July, 08:05 GMT,‘Nobody's Untouchable’,Kaja Sokola, 35, currently working as a psychologist in her native Poland, was a teen model living in New York in September 2002 when she claims she met the 50-year-old Weinstein at an event hosted by her agency, NEXT Model Management. She alleged in her 2019 lawsuit that Weinstein's driver picked her up a few days later and dropped them off at his SoHo apartment. It was there that Weinstein allegedly forced the young girl to undress as he “grabbed at her breasts before ejaculating on the floor.”,Sokola claimed that the powerful producer had blocked her from trying to leave his flat and subsequently threatened to destroy her career.,“Harvey Weinstein made clear that refusing his sexual demands would mean giving up the opportunity to make it in Hollywood,” the suit claimed.,Convicted Rapist Harvey Weinstein Reprimanded After Prison Guards Discover Milk Duds in Cell 4 March, 01:03 GMT,The woman’s allegations were recently reiterated by her in an interview with Rolling Stone. She has also accused Walt Disney Company, which owned Weinstein's production company Miramax from 1993 to 2010, of failing to investigate his actions.,Sokola said in her interview she hopes to hold Weinstein accountable with her suit, adding, “Nobody's untouchable right now.”,She addressed the ex-mogul’s closest circle, asking:,“I would ask, 'Was it worth it?' Because there's no shadow of doubt in me that they knew… I am very curious if Harvey looks in the mirror and he still thinks, 'All these b***hes,' or if he has any kind of reconciliation of what he has done.”,After Weintein’s denial of accusations levelled by Sokola, her attorneys Douglas Wigdor and Kevin Mintzer released a statement to the Daily Mail, saying:,“Mr. Weinstein should focus his energies on his next multi-victim rape trial in California.”,‘It Never Happened’,Previous lawsuits pertaining to Weintein’s sexual misconduct allegations had been jointly settled in a deal involving accusers, unsecured creditors and former Weinstein Co. employees after the company filed for bankruptcy in March 2018 and sold off most of its assets. Claims dating from before that time have reached the statute of limitations.,However, Sokola filed her lawsuit under a 2019 New York law. In February 2019, New York State passed a “lookback window,” the Child Victims Act (CVA), extending the statute of limitations for survivors of child sexual abuse in criminal and civil cases in New York.,Weinstein's legal team is insisting that if their client had, indeed, met Sokola, it could not have been until 2005, when she was 19. This would have made her not eligible to sue under New York State’s Sexual Abuse Lookback Statutes.,“I understand the motivations of trying to use the statute for a civil suit, but it never happened,” Weinstein told the publication via his spokesman. Furthermore, his representative added that the film producer did not own the SoHo apartment described in Sokola's lawsuit until 2005.,Weinstein's attorney Imran H. Ansari has insisted there is enough evidence to prove that his client did not meet Sokola in 2002.,“Importantly, Mr. Weinstein strongly contends that Ms. Sokola’s allegation of being 16-years-old when she met him is incorrect,” he stated, adding that “a timeline of events, corroborated by other evidence, including witness testimony, will refute Ms. Sokola’s allegations of sexual abuse as a minor,” rendering her ineligible to sue under the Child Victims Act.。    北京时间8月25日，根据ESPN名记Shams Charania报道，金州勇士终于完成了休赛期首笔自由球员签约，以一年260万美元的底薪合同签下后卫布兰登威廉姆斯。这笔签约也让勇士的正式合同名单达到了14人，距离满员还差最后1个名额。         布兰登威廉姆斯上赛季效力于达拉斯独行侠，交出了一份相当亮眼的成绩单：出战66场常规赛（其中15场首发），场均登场22.2分钟，贡献13.0分、2.9篮板、3.9助攻。他的整体投篮命中率达到47.2%，罚球命中率也有79.3%，是一位球风像极了欧文的家伙！          如果只看基础数据，场均13分在22分钟里已经相当高效。而更令人印象深刻的是，威廉姆斯在发展联盟的表现堪称统治级，证明了他具备在高强度比赛中扛起进攻的能力。         但问题也很明显：三分球。         威廉姆斯上赛季的三分命中率只有23.2%，这个数字在当今NBA几乎可以用“灾难”来形容。他的比赛风格非常鲜明：速度快、冲击力强，擅长利用挡拆直杀篮下，也能在转换进攻中推起节奏。但对手完全可以绕掩护、收缩内线来应对他，这就会压缩勇士本就拥挤的进攻空间。         那么，他适配勇士吗？          先说优点，勇士上赛季的第二阵容经常缺乏活力和突破威胁，而威廉姆斯恰恰能在这方面提供补充。薪资专家Keith Smith就表示：“布兰登威廉姆斯对于勇士来说是很好的选择，他能用他的速度带动第二阵容。

二 | ”在库里下场休息的时间段，勇士需要一个能持球突破、撕开防线的后卫，威廉姆斯的突破能力正好填补这个空缺。         再说隐患，首先是三分短板。勇士的进攻体系建立在空间和球的流转之上，一个三分命中率只有23.2%的后卫，在场上很容易被对手针对性放空。如果他与追梦等非投射型内线同时在场，进攻空间会被进一步压缩。         其次是位置重叠，签约完成后，勇士后场已经有库里、波杰姆斯基、梅尔顿、穆迪、小佩顿等多位后卫。威廉姆斯能否在激烈的竞争中争取到稳定轮换时间，还是个未知数。         客观来说，一年260万的底薪合同几乎不会占用太多薪资空间，即便威廉姆斯最终没能融入体系，放弃的代价也很低。对于一支在休赛期迟迟没有动作的球队来说，这至少是一个开始。但如果指望一个底薪球员来解决勇士最核心的问题，稳定的第二持球进攻点、锋线投射与内线护筐，那显然不现实。         威廉姆斯能突、能传、能得分，但他是否能适应勇士复杂的传切体系、能否在防守端不被针对，这些都需要训练营和赛季初期来验证。对于勇士球迷来说，这笔签约值得期待，但也不必抱有过高幻想。毕竟，260万买来的，是一个有短板但也能创造惊喜的“彩票”。

Current article:http://8hp.taokenlaichunlei.bond/2vr/20260826/64842.html

Published on:14:07:34